MPEP § 806.05(i) — Product, Process of Making, and Process of Using (Annotated Rules)

This page consolidates and annotates all enforceable requirements under MPEP § 806.05(i), including statutory authority, regulatory rules, examiner guidance, and practice notes. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Product, Process of Making, and Process of Using

This section addresses Product, Process of Making, and Process of Using. Primary authority: 37 CFR 1.141.

Key Rules

Mandatory Requirements (1)

StatutoryProhibitedAlways
[mpep-806-05-i-73ed1f77d446e40b3b822949]
Requirement for Product, Process of Making, and Process of Using
Note:
This rule permits the use of form paragraph 8.20 in situations where a product cannot be restricted from its process of making.

Form paragraph 8.20 (See MPEP § 806.05(h)) may be used in product, process of making and process of using situations where the product cannot be restricted from the process of making the product.

Conditional Requirements (2)

StatutoryRequiredAlways
[mpep-806-05-i-4f64b3985abc3214032b7176]
Requirement for Electing Product or Manufacturing Process
Note:
Applicant must elect to claim either the product itself or the process used to make it when claims are present for all three: product, manufacturing process, and use.

Where an application contains claims to a product, claims to a process specially adapted for (i.e., not patentably distinct from, as defined in MPEP § 806.05(f)) making the product, and claims to a process of using the product, applicant may be required to elect either (A) the product and process of making it; or (B) the process of using. If the examiner cannot make a showing of distinctness between the process of using and the product (MPEP § 806.05(h)), restriction cannot be required.

StatutoryProhibitedAlways
[mpep-806-05-i-9020f10f6ff3a8a395f5c959]
Requirement for Showing Distinctness Between Product and Use Process
Note:
The examiner must demonstrate that a process of using a product is patentably distinct from the product itself before requiring an election between them.

Where an application contains claims to a product, claims to a process specially adapted for (i.e., not patentably distinct from, as defined in MPEP § 806.05(f)) making the product, and claims to a process of using the product, applicant may be required to elect either (A) the product and process of making it; or (B) the process of using. If the examiner cannot make a showing of distinctness between the process of using and the product (MPEP § 806.05(h)), restriction cannot be required.

Definitions & Scope (1)

StatutoryInformativeAlways
[mpep-806-05-i-a5f9d98170a921812e72ed13]
Rejoinder Practice for Product and Process Inventions
Note:
This rule outlines the practice for rejoinder in cases involving both product and process inventions, as detailed in MPEP § 821.04(b).

See MPEP § 821.04(b) for rejoinder practice pertaining to product and process inventions.

Citations

Primary topicCitation
MPEP § 806.05(f)
MPEP § 806.05(h)
MPEP § 821.04(b)
Form Paragraph § 8.20

Source Text from USPTO’s MPEP

This is an exact copy of the MPEP from the USPTO. It is here for your reference to see the section in context.

BlueIron Last Updated: 2025-12-31