35 U.S.C. § 182 — Abandonment of invention for unauthorized (MPEP Coverage Index) – BlueIron IP
35 U.S.C. § 182 Abandonment of invention for unauthorized
This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting 35 U.S.C. § 182, including 8 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Summary
This section covers the abandonment of an invention disclosed in a patent application without the Commissioner's consent, leading to forfeiture of claims against the US and requiring separate filings for expedited licenses.
What this section covers
- Defines the conditions under which an invention may be deemed abandoned due to unauthorized disclosure in a patent application.
Key obligations
- Establish that an invention disclosed in a patent application was made without the Commissioner's consent.
- Prove that the unauthorized disclosure violated a foreign filing license, if applicable.
- Adhere to provisions of 35 USC § 182 for maintaining compliance and avoiding potential abandonment.
Practice notes
- Ensure all disclosures are made with the Commissioner's consent to avoid potential abandonment.
- Maintain records of all disclosures and obtain necessary approvals to comply with the provisions of 35 USC § 182.
Official MPEP § 182 — Abandonment of invention for unauthorized
Source: USPTOLast Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22
35 U.S.C. 182 Abandonment of invention for unauthorized disclosure.
The invention disclosed in an application for patent subject to an order made pursuant to section 181 may be held abandoned upon its being established by the Commissioner of Patents that in violation of said order the invention has been published or disclosed or that an application for a patent therefor has been filed in a foreign country by the inventor, his successors, assigns, or legal representatives, or anyone in privity with him or them, without the consent of the Commissioner of Patents. The abandonment shall be held to have occurred as of the time of violation. The consent of the Commissioner of Patents shall not be given without the concurrence of the heads of the departments and the chief officers of the agencies who caused the order to be issued. A holding of abandonment shall constitute forfeiture by the applicant, his successors, assigns, or legal representatives, or anyone in privity with him or them, of all claims against the United States based upon such invention.
(Amended Nov. 29, 1999, Public Law 106-113, sec. 1000(a)(9), 113 Stat. 1501A-582 (S. 1948 sec. 4732(a)(10)(B)); amended Sept. 16, 2011, Public Law 112-29, sec. 20(j) (effective Sept. 16, 2012), 125 Stat. 284.)
| MPEP Section | Rules |
|---|---|
| MPEP § 120 | |
| MPEP § 140 |