Why does the USPTO prohibit third-party submissions on patent term adjustment?
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
The USPTO prohibits third-party submissions on patent term adjustment to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the patent process. While MPEP 2736 doesn’t explicitly state the reasons, we can infer several potential justifications:
- To prevent unnecessary interference in the patent process
- To maintain the direct relationship between the USPTO and the patent applicant/owner
- To avoid potential abuse of the system by competitors or other interested parties
- To streamline the patent term adjustment process
The policy, as stated in MPEP 2736, is clear:
“No submission or petition on behalf of a third party concerning patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) will be considered by the Office.”
This rule ensures that patent term adjustment matters remain a bilateral issue between the USPTO and the patent applicant or owner, without external interference.