How should experimental data and examples be presented in a patent application?

When presenting experimental data and examples in a patent application:

  • Ensure accuracy of all statements and evidence
  • Clearly distinguish between actual results and predicted results
  • Use proper tense: past tense for actual experiments, present or future tense for prophetic examples
  • Label examples as prophetic or working examples to avoid ambiguities

MPEP 2004 advises: “Care should be taken to see that inaccurate statements, inaccurate evidence or inaccurate experiments are not introduced into the record, either inadvertently or intentionally.” It further states: “Paper or prophetic examples should not be described using the past tense.”

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2000 - Duty Of Disclosure, MPEP 2004 - Aids To Compliance With Duty Of Disclosure, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: Best Mode, Experimental Data, Prophetic Examples, Working Examples