What is the examiner’s role after an interference judgment?

The examiner’s role after an interference judgment is minimal, as stated in MPEP 2308.01: “No further action is needed from the examiner on that claim.” This means that once a judgment has been rendered in an interference proceeding, the examiner does not need to take any additional steps regarding the disposed claim.

However, the examiner does have a role if the interference judgment results in all claims being rejected. In such cases, the MPEP states: “If no claim remains allowable to the applicant, a notice of abandonment should be issued.” Therefore, the examiner’s responsibility is to:

  • Review the outcome of the interference
  • Determine if any claims remain allowable
  • Issue a notice of abandonment if no allowable claims remain

This process ensures that applications without any viable claims are formally closed, allowing the USPTO to efficiently manage its workload.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2300 - Interference And Derivation Proceedings, MPEP 2308.01 - Final Disposal Of Claims, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: Final Disposal, Interference Judgment, notice of abandonment, Patent Examiner, patent procedure