Who is responsible for determining if a supplemental examination request is compliant?

The responsibility for determining if a supplemental examination request is compliant lies with the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The MPEP states: If the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) determines that the request, as originally submitted, does not satisfy all of the requirements of 37 CFR 1.605, 1.610…

Read More

What happens if a request for supplemental examination is found noncompliant?

What happens if a request for supplemental examination is found noncompliant? If a request for supplemental examination is found to be noncompliant, the following process occurs: The Office will notify the patent owner of the reasons for noncompliance. The patent owner is given a single opportunity to correct the noncompliance. A corrected request must be…

Read More

What information is included in a Notice of Noncompliant Supplemental Examination Request?

A Notice of Noncompliant Supplemental Examination Request contains specific information to help the patent owner understand and address the issues. According to the MPEP: The notice will specify the defects found in the request, and provide a specified time, generally 15 days, within which a corrected request may be timely filed. If further explanation is…

Read More

What happens if a patent owner doesn’t respond to a Notice of Noncompliant Supplemental Examination Request?

If a patent owner fails to respond to a Notice of Noncompliant Supplemental Examination Request within the specified time, there are consequences. The MPEP states: If the patent owner does not timely comply with the notice, the request for supplemental examination will not be granted a filing date and the fee for reexamination as set…

Read More