What triggers an order for inter partes reexamination?

An order for inter partes reexamination is triggered when the Director finds that a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) affecting a claim of a patent is raised, or that there is a reasonable likelihood that the requester would prevail (RLP) with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the request. As…

Read More

How are prior art submissions handled after an inter partes reexamination order is issued?

Prior art submissions made after an inter partes reexamination order is issued are handled differently than those submitted before the order. According to MPEP 2646: “Any prior art citations under 37 CFR 1.501 submitted after the date of the decision ordering inter partes reexamination are stored until the reexamination is concluded. Note 37 CFR 1.902.…

Read More

Can a patent owner or third party requester petition to vacate an order granting reexamination?

Generally, neither the patent owner nor the third party requester can petition to vacate an order granting reexamination based on the substantive determination of a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) or reasonable likelihood of prevailing (RLP). As stated in MPEP 2646: “A substantive determination by the Director of the Office to institute reexamination pursuant…

Read More

How does the examiner’s decision granting a reexamination request differ from determining patentability?

The examiner’s decision granting a reexamination request focuses on whether there is a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) or a reasonable likelihood that the requester will prevail (RLP), rather than determining the ultimate patentability of the claims. According to MPEP 2646: “In the decision on the request, the examiner does not decide the ultimate…

Read More