How should examiners handle claims in a petitioner’s application during a derivation proceeding?

According to MPEP 2311, examiners should handle claims in a petitioner’s application during a derivation proceeding as follows: “The claims in petitioner’s application that are patentably indistinct from respondent’s application or patent should be subject to a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) which should be maintained until jurisdiction is transferred to the Board to conduct…

Read More

What should an examiner do when they find allowable subject matter in a derivation proceeding?

When an examiner finds allowable subject matter in an application involved in a derivation proceeding, they should follow specific guidelines as outlined in MPEP 2311: “When the examiner has determined that either the petitioner’s or the respondent’s application (where applicable) has allowable subject matter with respect to any claim, the examiner should refrain from taking…

Read More