What is procedural estoppel in patent interference proceedings?

Procedural estoppel in patent interference proceedings prevents a losing party from seeking relief that could have been—but was not—sought during the interference. MPEP 2308.03 states: “A losing party is procedurally barred from seeking from the examiner relief that could have been–but was not–sought in the interference.” This means that if an applicant had the opportunity…

Read More

What is the role of an Interference Practice Specialist (IPS) in post-interference examination?

An Interference Practice Specialist (IPS) plays a crucial role in post-interference examination, particularly when dealing with claims from a losing party. According to MPEP 2308.03: “The examiner should consult with an Interference Practice Specialist (IPS) before allowing a claim to a losing party that was added or amended during post-interference examination.” This consultation is important…

Read More

What is interference estoppel in patent law?

Interference estoppel in patent law refers to the principle that prevents a party from re-litigating an issue they lost in a previous interference proceeding. As stated in MPEP 2308.03: “If a party loses on an issue, it may not re-litigate the issue before the examiner or in a subsequent Board proceeding.” There are two main…

Read More