Can a third party requester intervene in court review of a reexamination decision?
While third party requesters cannot directly appeal reexamination decisions, they may be allowed to intervene in court reviews under certain circumstances. The MPEP 2279 states: “While the reexamination statutory provisions do not provide for participation by any third party requester during any court review, the courts have permitted intervention by a third party requester in…
Read MoreCan a third party requester appeal a decision in an ex parte reexamination?
No, a third party requester in an ex parte reexamination cannot seek judicial review of a decision. The MPEP 2279 clearly states: “A third party requester of an ex parte reexamination may not seek judicial review.” This principle is supported by case law, specifically Yuasa Battery v. Comm’r, 3 USPQ2d 1143 (D.D.C. 1987). However, it’s…
Read MoreWhat are the options for a patent owner to appeal a decision of the Board in a reexamination proceeding?
A patent owner who is not satisfied with the decision of the Board in a reexamination proceeding has limited options for appeal. According to MPEP 2279, “The patent owner may appeal the decision of the Board only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 141.” This applies…
Read MoreWhat is the legal basis for appeals in patent reexamination proceedings?
The legal basis for appeals in patent reexamination proceedings is primarily found in U.S. statutes and has evolved over time. According to MPEP 2279: 1. For reexaminations filed on or after November 29, 1999, and commenced before September 16, 2012, the basis is “the version of 35 U.S.C. 141 and 35 U.S.C. 145 as they…
Read More