Can a patent owner designate separate addresses for different reexamination proceedings?

Yes, a patent owner can designate separate addresses for different reexamination proceedings on the same patent. MPEP 2222 explicitly states: “A patent owner may designate a separate correspondence address for each reexamination proceeding for which a request is filed.” This allows patent owners to manage multiple reexamination proceedings more efficiently, especially if different legal representatives…

Read More

What are a practitioner’s responsibilities regarding client communication after a patent issues?

Even after a patent issues, practitioners have ongoing responsibilities regarding client communication, particularly concerning USPTO correspondence. The MPEP 2222 references 37 CFR 11.104, which states: “A practitioner should not fail to timely and adequately inform a client or former client of correspondence received from the Office when the correspondence: (i) could have a significant effect…

Read More

What happens if a patent owner doesn’t provide a correspondence address for reexamination?

If a patent owner fails to provide a correspondence address for reexamination, the USPTO will take the following steps: Use the correspondence address of record in the patent file If no address is available, attempt to contact the patent owner at the last known address MPEP 2222 states: “If no correspondence address is otherwise specified,…

Read More

How can a patent owner change the correspondence address for a patent under reexamination?

To change the correspondence address for a patent under reexamination, the patent owner should submit a request to the USPTO. The MPEP 2222 provides specific instructions for such submissions: “Where a request for ex parte reexamination has been filed:” Mail Stop “Ex Parte Reexam”Attn: Central Reexamination UnitCommissioner for PatentsP.O. Box 1450Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 For inter…

Read More