How does the USPTO view the importance of claim definiteness in patent quality?

The USPTO places great importance on claim definiteness as a crucial factor in patent quality. The MPEP explicitly states: “Optimizing patent quality by providing clear notice to the public of the boundaries of the inventive subject matter protected by a patent grant fosters innovation and competitiveness. Accordingly, providing high quality patents is one of the…

Read More

What actions must a patent examiner take when encountering indefinite claim language?

When a patent examiner encounters indefinite claim language, they are required to take specific actions. The MPEP provides clear guidance: “Therefore, claims that do not meet this standard must be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph as indefinite. Such a rejection requires that the applicant respond by explaining why…

Read More