How does the USPTO determine if a claim is too broad?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) uses several criteria to determine if a claim is too broad. According to MPEP 2173.04, the assessment depends on the specific issues with the claim: Inventor’s Regard: If the claim is broader than what the inventor regards as the invention, it may be rejected under 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreWhat statutory provisions address undue breadth in patent claims?
Undue breadth in patent claims can be addressed under different statutory provisions, depending on the specific issues. The MPEP 2173.04 outlines three main scenarios: 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph: “If the claim is too broad because it does not set forth that which the inventor or a joint inventor regards…
Read MoreWhen is a broad claim considered indefinite?
A broad claim is considered indefinite when it lacks clarity in defining its scope. The MPEP 2173.04 states: “A broad claim is not indefinite merely because it encompasses a wide scope of subject matter provided the scope is clearly defined. But a claim is indefinite when the boundaries of the protected subject matter are not…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between breadth and indefiniteness in patent claims?
Breadth and indefiniteness are distinct concepts in patent claims. As stated in MPEP 2173.04, “Breadth of a claim is not to be equated with indefiniteness.” The section further explains: “A broad claim is not indefinite merely because it encompasses a wide scope of subject matter provided the scope is clearly defined. But a claim is…
Read More