What is the significance of the 35 U.S.C. 122(b) publication in patent examination?
The publication of a patent application under 35 U.S.C. 122(b) is significant in patent examination, particularly for copending applications. According to MPEP 2154.01(d): “If the first application will not be published pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b), it must be allowed to issue once all the statutory requirements are met. After the patent is published, it…
Read MoreWhat is a redacted application publication in patent law?
A redacted application publication is a special type of patent application publication where certain information has been removed or obscured. MPEP 2154.01(d) mentions redacted publications in the context of provisional rejections: “[A] provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) may be made, in the circumstances described below, if the earlier filed, pending application has been published…
Read MoreWhen can a provisional rejection be made for copending applications?
A provisional rejection can be made for copending applications under specific circumstances. According to MPEP 2154.01(d): “If a first application has (1) at least one common (joint) inventor or common applicant with a second application or the applications are commonly assigned, and (2) the first application, upon publication or issuance, would qualify as prior art…
Read MoreWhat is a provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2)?
A provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) is a type of patent rejection that can be made when there are copending U.S. patent applications with overlapping subject matter. According to MPEP 2154.01(d): “If an earlier filed, copending, and unpublished U.S. patent application discloses subject matter which would anticipate the claims in a later filed pending…
Read MoreHow can a provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) be overcome?
A provisional rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) can be overcome in several ways. According to MPEP 2154.01(d): “A provisional rejection based on 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art can be overcome in the same manner that a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejection can be overcome. See MPEP § 2152.06. The provisional rejection can also be overcome by…
Read MoreWhat happens if copending applications have no common inventor, applicant, or assignee?
When copending applications have no common inventor, applicant, or assignee, the treatment differs. MPEP 2154.01(d) states: “If there is no common assignee, common applicant, or common (joint) inventor and the application was not published pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b), the confidential status of applications under 35 U.S.C. 122(a) must be maintained and no rejection can…
Read More