What constitutes a “public use” under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)?
A “public use” under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) is defined in the MPEP 2152.02(c) as follows: “Public use” includes any use of the claimed invention by a person other than the inventor or a joint inventor, or any use of the claimed invention by the inventor or a joint inventor that is accessible to the public.…
Read MoreWhat constitutes “secret use” in patent law?
What constitutes “secret use” in patent law? In patent law, “secret use” refers to the use of an invention that is kept confidential and not accessible to the public. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2152.02(c) states: “An inventor’s private use or sale of the invention is not prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreCan a secret commercial use be considered a “public use” for patent purposes?
Yes, a secret commercial use can be considered a “public use” for patent purposes. The MPEP 2152.02(c) states: “[A] secret or confidential use by an inventor or someone working with the inventor, which use is commercial in character, is considered a public use even though no member of the public viewed the use.” This interpretation…
Read MoreHow does the AIA treat secret commercial use compared to pre-AIA law?
The treatment of secret commercial use under the AIA differs significantly from pre-AIA law. Under pre-AIA law, secret commercial use by the inventor could bar patentability. The MPEP states: “[A]n inventor’s own prior commercial use, albeit kept secret, may constitute a public use or sale under [pre-AIA 35 U.S.C.] 102(b), barring him from obtaining a…
Read MoreWhat is the “public use” grace period under the AIA?
The America Invents Act (AIA) introduced a grace period for public use disclosures. According to MPEP 2152.02(c): “Under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b), an applicant was barred from receiving a patent if the invention claimed in the application was in public use in this country more than one year prior to the date of the application…
Read MoreWhat constitutes a “public use” under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)?
Under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), a “public use” that can bar patentability is any use that is available to the public, regardless of geographic location. The MPEP states: “Under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), there is no geographic limitation on where prior public use or public availability occurs.” This means that public uses anywhere in the…
Read MoreWhat is the role of the patent examiner in investigating potential public uses under the AIA?
Under the AIA, patent examiners play an important role in investigating potential public uses that could affect the patentability of an invention. The MPEP provides guidance on this matter: “[O]nce an examiner becomes aware that a claimed invention has been the subject of a potentially public use, the examiner should require the applicant to provide…
Read MoreHow does the AIA treat an inventor’s own prior use compared to pre-AIA law?
The AIA treats an inventor’s own prior use differently from pre-AIA law. Under the AIA, an inventor’s own public use is subject to the same rules as third-party public uses, but with important exceptions. The MPEP explains: “The public use provision of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) thus has the same substantive scope, with respect to…
Read MoreWhat are the exceptions to public use under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)?
The AIA provides exceptions to what would otherwise be considered public use under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1). These exceptions are outlined in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1). The MPEP states: “[C]ertain uses or sales are subject to the exceptions in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1), e.g., uses or sales by the inventor or a joint inventor (or have originated with…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of the “effective filing date” in determining public use?
What is the significance of the “effective filing date” in determining public use? The “effective filing date” plays a crucial role in determining whether a claimed invention was in public use for patent purposes. According to MPEP 2152.02(c): “Under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1), a person shall be entitled to a patent unless the claimed invention…
Read More