How are Statutory Invention Registrations (SIRs) treated under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e)?
Statutory Invention Registrations (SIRs) are treated similarly to U.S. patents under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e). The MPEP explains: “In accordance with former 35 U.S.C. 157(c), a published SIR will be treated the same as a U.S. patent for all defensive purposes, usable as a reference as of its filing date in the same manner as…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) in patent law?
Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) is a crucial provision in patent law that allows certain international application publications, U.S. patent application publications, and U.S. patents to be used as prior art. The MPEP states: “Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) allows the use of certain international application publications and U.S. patent application publications, and certain U.S. patents as…
Read MoreHow are provisional application filing dates considered under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e)?
The filing date of a provisional application can be critical for determining the prior art date under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e), but specific conditions must be met. The MPEP states: “Note that for benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), the critical reference date under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) may be the filing date of a…
Read MoreWhat is the effect of non-English WIPO publications under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e)?
Non-English WIPO publications have a specific treatment under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e). The MPEP clearly states: “All references, whether the WIPO publication, the U.S. patent application publication or the U.S. patent, of an international application (IA) that was filed on or after November 29, 2000, but was not published in English under PCT Article 21(2)…
Read MoreWhat is the relevance of the inventive entity in pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejections?
The inventive entity plays a crucial role in applying pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejections. The MPEP states: “In order to apply a reference under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e), the inventive entity of the application must be different from that of the cited reference.” Importantly, for applications with joint inventors, the MPEP clarifies: “Note that, where…
Read More