What is the time limit for a patent owner to respond to an Office action in an inter partes reexamination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The patent owner is typically given a period of two months to respond to an Office action in an inter partes reexamination. As stated in the MPEP, “ The patent owner will normally be given a period of two months to respond to an Office action .” It’s important to note that extensions of time are limited in reexamination proceedings and can only be obtained in accordance with 37 CFR 1.956 . Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Inter Partes Reexamination Not Acceptable After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666 No Inter Partes Reexamination After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.01 No Inter Partes Reexamination After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.05 No Inter Partes Reexamination After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.10 Inter Partes Reexamination Not Acceptable After September 16, 2012 MPEP 2666.40 No Third Party Comments After Patent Owner Response MPEP 2666.20 Patent Owner Must Serve Response to Reexamination Requester MPEP 2266 Premature Patent Owner Response Not Considered MPEP 2249 Patent Owner Must Serve Response to Third Party MPEP 2266 Required Patent Owner Can Request Extension for Reexamination Response MPEP 2249 Permitted Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What are the consequences of a patent owner failing to respond to an Office action in an inter partes reexamination? Can a patent owner file papers on behalf of a third party in an inter partes reexamination? How should a patent owner respond to rejections in an inter partes reexamination? How should a patent owner serve a response on the third party requester in an inter partes reexamination? Can a patent owner file a supplemental response in an inter partes reexamination?