When is a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit appropriate in a patent application?
A 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit is appropriate when an applicant needs to antedate a reference cited against their patent application. Specifically, it’s used to show prior invention before the effective date of the cited reference. According to MPEP 715.01: “An affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) may be used, in the context of a…
Read MoreWho can file an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a)?
Several parties can file an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a), including: All the inventors of the claimed subject matter Less than all named inventors, if it’s shown that they invented the claimed subject matter In applications filed before September 16, 2012: joint inventors or assignees under pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.47, or legal representatives…
Read MoreWhen does diligence become a factor in patent examination?
Diligence becomes a factor in patent examination when an inventor is attempting to establish prior invention under 37 CFR 1.131(a). The MPEP states, In determining the sufficiency of a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit or declaration, diligence need not be considered unless conception of the invention prior to the effective date is clearly established, pursuant to…
Read MoreWhen is an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) not appropriate?
An affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) is not appropriate in several situations, including: When the reference is claiming interfering subject matter as defined in 37 CFR 41.203(a) When the reference is a statutory bar under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) The MPEP states: An affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) is not appropriate…
Read MoreWhat is ‘swearing behind’ a reference?
‘Swearing behind’ a reference refers to the process of filing an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) to overcome a rejection in certain patent applications. This process allows an applicant or patent owner to establish a date of completion of the invention prior to the effective date of a reference used in a rejection.…
Read MoreWhat should I do if an inventor is unavailable to sign an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a)?
If an inventor is unavailable to sign an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a), the procedure depends on the application filing date: For applications filed before September 16, 2012: The remaining joint inventors can sign the affidavit or declaration. A petition under 37 CFR 1.183 requesting waiver of the unavailable inventor’s signature must be…
Read MoreCan I submit an affidavit or declaration after an appeal has been filed?
Yes, you can submit an affidavit or declaration after an appeal has been filed, but there are specific rules governing this process. MPEP 715.09 refers to other sections for guidance on this matter: For affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.131(a) filed after appeal, see 37 CFR 41.33(d) and MPEP § 1206 and § 1211.03.…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between species and embodiments in patent rejections?
In patent rejections, species typically refer to members of a claimed genus, while embodiments are different versions or implementations of a single claimed invention. This distinction is important when overcoming rejections. As stated in MPEP 715.03: “References or activities which disclose one or more embodiments of a single claimed invention, as opposed to species of…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for filing an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a)?
An affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a) may be necessary even when there is common ownership between a reference and an application. According to MPEP 715.01(b): The mere fact that the reference patent or application publication which shows but does not claim certain subject matter and the application which claims it are owned by…
Read MoreWhat must be shown in a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit to overcome a prior art reference?
To successfully overcome a prior art reference using a 37 CFR 1.131(a) affidavit or declaration, the inventor(s) must show: Conception of the invention prior to the effective date of the reference Diligence in reducing the invention to practice from a time just prior to the effective date of the reference to the date of actual…
Read More