What is the process for submitting a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 to overcome a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) rejection?
To submit a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 to overcome a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) rejection, you must: File a corrected application data sheet (ADS) or amend the specification, depending on the application filing date: For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012: File a corrected ADS under 37 CFR 1.76 with a…
Read MoreHow can priority claims be used to overcome a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection?
Priority claims can be an effective way to overcome a pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e) rejection. This can be done through either foreign priority claims or domestic benefit claims. For foreign priority claims, the MPEP states: “Submitting a claim to priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a) – (d) within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.55”…
Read MoreHow is the effective filing date determined for a continuation or divisional application?
For continuation or divisional applications, the effective filing date is determined as follows: “If the application is a continuation or divisional of one or more earlier U.S. applications or international applications and if the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 120 or 365(c) have been satisfied, the effective filing date of the claimed invention is the same…
Read MoreHow can I use a benefit claim to overcome a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection?
To overcome a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection using a benefit claim, you can: Submit a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 within the time period set in 37 CFR 1.78 Submit a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) for a provisional application According to MPEP 2152.06: “Submitting a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 120 within…
Read MoreWhat does “termination of proceedings” mean in patent applications?
“Termination of proceedings” is a term found in 35 U.S.C. 120 and refers to the end of prosecution for a patent application. Proceedings are considered terminated in the following situations: When the issue fee is not paid and the application is abandoned In interference cases where all claims correspond to the counts and the application…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for claiming benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 in a design patent application?
To claim benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 in a design patent application, the following requirements must be met: The later-filed application must contain a reference to the prior-filed copending application. For applications filed on or after September 16, 2012, the specific reference must be in the application data sheet (37 CFR 1.76). For applications filed…
Read MoreWhat happens if the only error identified in a reissue declaration is to delete a 35 U.S.C. 120 benefit claim?
If the only error identified in the reissue declaration is the need to delete a 35 U.S.C. 120 benefit claim, and there’s no mention of increasing the patent term, the examiner should not reject the application under 35 U.S.C. 251. According to MPEP 1405: “If the only error identified in the reissue declaration is the…
Read MoreWhat if a reissue declaration aims to correct the patent term by deleting a 35 U.S.C. 120 benefit claim?
If the only error identified in the reissue declaration is stated to be the correction or adjustment of the patent term by deleting the 35 U.S.C. 120 benefit claim, the application will be rejected. According to MPEP 1405: “If the only error identified in the reissue declaration is stated to be the correction or adjustment…
Read MoreHow does foreign priority affect benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120 in continuation-in-part (CIP) design applications?
Foreign priority can significantly affect benefit claims under 35 U.S.C. 120 in continuation-in-part (CIP) design applications, especially when the conditions of 35 U.S.C. 120 are not met: If the CIP application doesn’t meet the conditions of 35 U.S.C. 120 (e.g., insufficient disclosure), it’s not entitled to the benefit of the parent application’s filing date. In…
Read MoreCan a design patent application claim benefit from a utility patent application under 35 U.S.C. 120?
Yes, a design patent application can claim benefit from a utility patent application under 35 U.S.C. 120, provided certain conditions are met: The design must be fully disclosed in the earlier utility application in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112(a). The utility application must meet all the requirements for a proper benefit claim under 35 U.S.C.…
Read More