Can a provisional application be called a ‘continuation’?
No, a provisional application should not be referred to as a ‘continuation’. The MPEP clearly states: “An application claiming the benefit of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) should not be called a ‘continuation’ of the provisional application.” This is because provisional applications serve a different purpose than continuation applications. Provisional applications are temporary…
Read MoreWhat is the relationship between 35 U.S.C. 119(e) and patent application assignments?
35 U.S.C. 119(e) is crucial in understanding the relationship between provisional applications and their non-provisional counterparts, particularly in terms of assignments. The MPEP § 306.01 states: If an application which claims the benefit of the earlier filing date of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) includes only subject matter which formed a part of…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for claiming the benefit of a prior-filed provisional application?
To claim the benefit of a prior-filed provisional application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), the following requirements must be met: The nonprovisional application must be filed within 12 months of the provisional application’s filing date (unless the benefit has been restored) The provisional application must have at least one common inventor with the nonprovisional application The…
Read More