Can a broad allegation of error satisfy the requirement for a complete reply to a restriction requirement?

No, a broad allegation of error is not sufficient to satisfy the requirement for a complete reply to a restriction requirement. The MPEP 818.01(a) clearly states:

“A mere broad allegation that the requirement is in error does not comply with the requirement of 37 CFR 1.111.”

To provide a complete reply, the applicant must specifically point out the reason(s) why they believe the restriction requirement is in error. This requires a detailed and substantive response addressing the specific aspects of the restriction requirement that the applicant disputes.

To learn more:

Tags: broad allegation, Complete Reply, patent application, patent examination, Restriction Requirement